Skip to content

The perils of information - Evidences from a family MNC

Internationalization strategies

Internationalization of family firms can be regarded as an entrepreneurial strategy with the aim of company growth (Kraus et al., 2012), encouraged by their longterm orientation (Claver et al., 2009). However, researchers have founded and provided contrasting evidences about the relation between family involvement and internationalization (De Massis et al., 2012). While some scholars highlight the conservative, risk averse, and inflexible attitude of family firms (i.e., a contradiction), other scholars see them as a setting where entrepreneurship is enabled to born (Mitter et al., 2014).

Historically, Gallo and Sveen (1991) wrote the first seminal work: they found as family businesses are more rigid and slower to internationalize then non-family ones. Five years after, Gallo and Garcia Pont (1996) identified some factors that influence the internationalization process in family firms, classifying them according to two dimensions: rigidity variables and elasticity ones. These variables are summarized as strategic factors (firm’s features and its environment), family issues (internal organization), and top management’s attitudes.

Graves and Thomas (2006, and 2008) suggest that the main characteristics that affect a family firm’s ability to internationalize are the attitude toward risk-taking, vision and managerial style of successors, expertise of working family members, the degree of family harmony, and family equity (own financial) issues. Moreover, Tsang (2002) suggests as family businesses have different and distinctive approach in dealing with foreign direct investments (FDIs) because are characterized by less developed information and control systems.

The SEW aspects introduced in the previous paragraph – in particular, the fear of losing control – are the main barriers to going international: becoming international implies changes, as strategies and the entire organizational structure have to be redesigned.

Many family members are suspicious of this redesign because they fear changes in ownership and management that negatively influence their decision-making power (Gallo & Sveen, 1991; Bhaumik et al., 2010, Mitter et al., 2014). Table 4 summarizes main seminal academic’s contributions until 2005.

In general, concerning the overall process of venturing into foreign markets, most studies support the already mentioned Uppsala stage model for family firms (Calabrò, 2014; Mitter et al., 2014), starting exporting activities within country at low distance, both in cultral and geographical terms (e.g., Graves & Thomas 2004, 2008; Claver et al. 2007; Puig & Fernandez Perez, 2009).. Hence, accumulating knowledge and resources, they expanded in more remote markets.

In specific, FBs tend to choose foreign market entry modes that do not threaten their independence, avoiding strategic alliances and joint ventures, which not only require resources but also the relinquishment of control.

This aloofness avoided around when the involved partner is another FB, because of shared values concerning trust, loyalty, and continuity (Fuentes-Lombardo and Fernandez-Ortiz, 2010; Swinth and Vinton, 1993). Last, research shows that families’ new generations seems to be almost entirely positive on internationalization.

As new generations seek to enter the business, they either create own “space” for themselves through foreign subsidiaries, or – generally – try to foster the business through international expansion (Fernández & Nieto, 2005; Menéndez Requejo, 2005; Okoroafo & Perryy, 2010). However, other studies indicate no impact of higher generational involvement on internationalization, an effect that can be explained through the increasing size of the businesses (Westhead & Howorth, 2006; Okoroafo & Koh, 2010, Pukall & Calabrò 2014).

Questo brano è tratto dalla tesi:

The perils of information - Evidences from a family MNC


La consultazione è esclusivamente in formato digitale .PDF


Informazioni tesi

  Autore: Davide Gamba
  Tipo: Tesi di Laurea Magistrale
  Anno: 2014-15
  Università: Università degli Studi di Bergamo
  Facoltà: Ingegneria
  Corso: Ingegneria gestionale
  Relatore: Tommaso Minola
  Lingua: Inglese
  Num. pagine: 205

DUBBI? Contattaci

Contatta la redazione a
[email protected]

Ci trovi su Skype (redazione_tesi)
dalle 9:00 alle 13:00

Oppure vieni a trovarci su

Parole chiave

knowledge sharing
family business
step project
knowledge transfer tools
internationalization stretegy
social sciences

Non hai trovato quello che cercavi?

Abbiamo più di 45.000 Tesi di Laurea: cerca nel nostro database

Oppure consulta la sezione dedicata ad appunti universitari selezionati e pubblicati dalla nostra redazione

Ottimizza la tua ricerca:

  • individua con precisione le parole chiave specifiche della tua ricerca
  • elimina i termini non significativi (aggettivi, articoli, avverbi...)
  • se non hai risultati amplia la ricerca con termini via via più generici (ad esempio da "anziano oncologico" a "paziente oncologico")
  • utilizza la ricerca avanzata
  • utilizza gli operatori booleani (and, or, "")

Idee per la tesi?

Scopri le migliori tesi scelte da noi sugli argomenti recenti

Come si scrive una tesi di laurea?

A quale cattedra chiedere la tesi? Quale sarà il docente più disponibile? Quale l'argomento più interessante per me? ...e quale quello più interessante per il mondo del lavoro?

Scarica gratuitamente la nostra guida "Come si scrive una tesi di laurea" e iscriviti alla newsletter per ricevere consigli e materiale utile.

La tesi l'ho già scritta,
ora cosa ne faccio?

La tua tesi ti ha aiutato ad ottenere quel sudato titolo di studio, ma può darti molto di più: ti differenzia dai tuoi colleghi universitari, mostra i tuoi interessi ed è un lavoro di ricerca unico, che può essere utile anche ad altri.

Il nostro consiglio è di non sprecare tutto questo lavoro:

È ora di pubblicare la tesi